The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has lowered the rating for Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust’s child and adolescent mental health (CAMHS) ward at Chalkhill following an inspection that found improvements were needed.
Chalkhill, a 16-bedded mixed gender inpatient unit, is a mental health facility in the grounds of a general acute hospital, where young people aged 12-17 are admitted if they require assessment and treatment for acute mental health needs. It offers assessment and treatment for a wide range of mental health difficulties and needs, as well as support for eating disorders.
This inspection was carried out because CQC had received concerns including the safety and wellbeing of young people using the service, and high levels of incidents leading to harm.
Inspectors found:
The service’s overall rating dropped from good to requires improvement, as have the service’s ratings for how safe and well-led it is. The overall rating for Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust remains good.
Following the inspection the CQC issued a warning notice to focus the trust’s attention on making rapid and widespread improvements regarding good governance.
Neil Cox, CQC deputy director of operations in the south, said: ‘When we inspected Chalkhill we found a decline in the quality of leadership at the service which was having an impact on the level of care being provided to the young people using this service.
‘It was incredibly concerning some young people had come to harm, and others had been put at risk, because leaders had poor oversight, and didn’t always have good enough systems in place to keep them safe.
‘Leaders didn’t always manage risks well, and they didn’t learn from incidents when things went wrong, to stop them from happening again. Also, despite the trust having an action plan in place, we didn’t feel assured those improvements were happening quick enough.
‘We also saw there were signs of a closed culture at the service. The trust didn’t do everything they could to ensure they were being open and transparent, and young people told us they didn’t always feel safe or supported to raise concerns. Staff confirmed this, as well as telling us the impact this had on their morale as a result. Leaders need to do more to listen to the experiences of people using the service as well as staff, to make improvements.
‘We found a number of blanket restrictions in place for the young people staying there. For example, due to one person’s behaviours, all young people had to ask for staff to make them hot drinks and weren’t allowed to do this for themselves. We also saw it was practice that all the internal ward doors to the lounge, quiet room, garden space and bedrooms should be locked which infringed people’s human rights.
‘However, we have also seen more recent positive changes to the management of the service. They know where they need to improve and we’ll return to check on their progress. We will monitor them closely during this time to make sure people using the service are safe.’
Image: Greyerbaby
Mental health support is ‘paramount’: government to offer thousands to expand services
Children under five are facing lifelong mental health conditions